By now you have a refined, professional-grade Use Case Diagram that clearly shows actors, core goals, shared functionality («include»), and conditional extensions («extend»). This high-level view answers “Who does what, and in what variants?” — but it does not yet explain how each goal is achieved step by step.
Module 4 shifts the focus from structure to behavioral detail. Here you write the full textual use case specification — the detailed narrative that describes exactly what happens when an actor pursues a goal. This is the most critical bridge between requirements and implementation: developers, testers, UX designers, and stakeholders all rely on these specifications to understand expected system behavior, edge cases, preconditions, postconditions, and alternative paths.
A well-written use case specification typically includes the following structured sections:
- Use Case Name and ID
- Primary Actor
- Secondary Actors (if any)
- Preconditions (what must be true before the use case can start)
- Postconditions (what must be true after successful completion)
- Main Success Scenario (the happy path — numbered steps)
- Alternative Flows (variations that still lead to success)
- Exception Flows (error conditions and how the system recovers or fails gracefully)
- Extension Points (where «extend» use cases insert behavior)
- Business Rules / Non-functional Notes (if relevant)
- Priority & Frequency
In traditional projects, writing these specifications is one of the most time-consuming activities — often resulting in inconsistent style, missing edge cases, or outdated documents. Visual Paradigm’s AI-Powered Use Case Modeling Studio transforms this effort by generating comprehensive, multi-section specifications automatically from:
- The use case name
- Its relationships («include», «extend»)
- The problem context and scope
- Actor goals identified earlier
The AI produces a complete draft in seconds, written in clear, structured, numbered prose. You then refine it collaboratively in the integrated markdown-style editor — adding domain-specific rules, adjusting tone, or inserting precise business logic — while the tool keeps everything traceable to the diagram.
Practical Examples of AI-Generated + Refined Specifications (Excerpts)
Example 1: GourmetReserve – Use Case: Book a Table
AI-Generated Draft (partial):
- Use Case: Book a Table
- Primary Actor: Diner
- Preconditions: Diner is authenticated; at least one restaurant is registered in the system
- Postconditions: A table reservation is confirmed; a deposit (if required) is processed; confirmation and reminder notifications are scheduled
- Main Success Scenario
- Diner searches for available tables by location, date, time, and party size.
- System displays matching restaurants and open slots.
- Diner selects a restaurant, time slot, and party size.
- System includes Process Payment (required deposit).
- Diner confirms booking details.
- System creates reservation record and sends confirmation.
- Alternative Flows 3a. If no tables available → System offers waitlist option (extends via Handle Waitlist).
- Exception Flows 4a. Payment fails → System displays error and returns to payment retry or cancel.
Typical Refinement You Add: Insert business rule at step 4: “Deposit is 10% of estimated bill for parties > 8 or peak hours (Fri/Sat 7–9 pm).”
Example 2: SecureATM – Use Case: Withdraw Cash
AI-Generated Structure (excerpt):
- Preconditions: User has inserted valid card or authenticated via mobile; sufficient funds available
- Main Success Scenario
- System includes Authenticate User.
- User selects “Withdraw Cash”.
- System includes Validate Transaction Limits.
- User enters amount.
- System dispenses cash and updates balance.
- System offers receipt (extends via Print Receipt).
- Exception Flows 4a. Amount exceeds daily limit → System displays message and returns to amount entry. 5a. Insufficient funds → System shows error and suggests lower amount. 5b. Cash cassette empty → System displays “Temporarily unavailable” and alerts operations team.
Example 3: CorpLearn – Use Case: Take Final Assessment
AI-Generated + Refined Highlights:
- Main Success Scenario
- Learner selects “Start Assessment” from course page.
- System presents timed questions (multiple choice, short answer).
- Learner submits answers.
- System includes Record Learning Progress.
- If score ≥ 80% → System extends with Issue Certificate.
- Exception Flows 3a. Time expires → System auto-submits current answers. 5a. Score < 80% → System offers retake option (if allowed by course policy) or marks course incomplete.
Why This Step Remains Essential (Even with AI)
The AI excels at producing consistent, well-structured drafts quickly — but it cannot know your organization’s specific policies, regulatory constraints, pricing logic, error-recovery preferences, or subtle user experience decisions. You — the requirements engineer or product owner — remain the decision-maker:
- You validate that every exception flow covers real-world risks.
- You ensure postconditions align with compliance or audit needs.
- You refine wording so developers and testers interpret intent correctly.
By the end of Module 4, each major use case will have a detailed, readable, and traceable specification that serves as:
- The single source of truth for development
- The foundation for generating Activity & Sequence Diagrams (Module 5)
- The direct input for automated test case creation (Module 7)
You’ve now moved from a bird’s-eye view of functionality to a step-by-step blueprint of system behavior — and thanks to AI assistance, you’ve done so in a fraction of the traditional time while retaining full control over quality and accuracy.