Streamlining the Software Lifecycle: Integrating AI Use Case Modeling with Visual Paradigm’s All-in-One Platform

⌘K
  2. ホーム
  4. ドキュメント
  6. Streamlining the Software...
  8. 6. Scenario Analysis and ...
  10. 6.1 Scenario Breakdown

6.1 Scenario Breakdown

Converting Narrative Descriptions into Actionable Decision Tables

Narrative use case flows — even when written clearly with numbered main scenarios, alternative flows, and exception paths — can hide complexity. Multiple decision points, interdependent conditions, and subtle combinations of states often lead to overlooked edge cases, ambiguous outcomes, or contradictory rules. The scenario breakdown technique addresses this by systematically decomposing the narrative into a finite, manageable set of concrete scenarios, and then — most powerfully — representing the decision logic in compact, exhaustive decision tables.

A decision table is a tabular format that lists:

  • Conditions (inputs, states, guards, business rules) as columns
  • Rules (unique combinations) as rows
  • Actions (system responses, outcomes, next steps) in the lower part of the table

The goal is completeness (every meaningful combination is explicitly considered), consistency (no contradictory actions for the same conditions), and conciseness (merge equivalent rules where possible).

In Visual Paradigm’s AI-Powered Use Case Modeling Studio, you can initiate this process by selecting a use case specification and choosing “Generate Decision Table” or “Break Down Scenarios”. The AI:

  • Scans the main, alternative, and exception flows
  • Identifies decision nodes from Activity Diagrams and conditional branches in Sequence Diagrams
  • Proposes key conditions and possible values
  • Generates an initial decision table covering happy path + major alternatives/exceptions
  • Suggests additional conditions it infers from preconditions, postconditions, or business context

You then refine the table by:

  • Adding domain-specific conditions
  • Adjusting condition values/ranges
  • Splitting overly broad rules
  • Merging redundant rules
  • Annotating outcomes with exact messages, state changes, or traceability links

The resulting decision table becomes one of the strongest artifacts for logic validation, stakeholder review, and direct test-case derivation.

Practical Examples

Example 1: GourmetReserve – Use Case: Book a Table

Narrative triggers for breakdown (excerpt from specification): “Step 4: System includes Process Payment… Deposit is required for parties ≥ 8 OR peak hours (Fri/Sat 7–9 pm), unless diner has Gold loyalty status. If valid promo code entered, discount applied before deposit calculation. If payment fails, booking aborted.”

AI-Generated Initial Decision Table (refined version):

Rule Authenticated? Tables Available? Party Size ≥ 8? Peak Hours? Gold Loyalty? Valid Promo Code? Payment Succeeds? Outcome Trace to Flow
1 Yes Yes No No — — Yes Confirmed – no deposit Main 4–7
2 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Confirmed – deposit waived Main 4–7
3 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Confirmed – 10% deposit collected Main 4–7
4 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Confirmed – discounted deposit collected Alt 4a
5 Yes Yes — — — — No Error: “Payment failed. Try again or cancel” Exc 4b
6 Yes No — — — — — Offer waitlist → Join waitlist OR alternatives Alt 3a
7 No — — — — — — Redirect to login / register Precondition

Your refinement:

  • Added column “Party Size ≥ 12?” → If Yes → New outcome: “Pending manager approval” (even if deposit succeeds)
  • Merged rules where promo doesn’t affect deposit requirement

Example 2: SecureATM – Use Case: Withdraw Cash

Decision Table (after AI generation + refinement):

Rule Authenticated? Amount ≤ Daily Limit? Sufficient Funds? Sufficient Cash in ATM? High-Value (> $1,000)? Biometric OK? Outcome
1 Yes Yes Yes Yes No — Dispense cash, update balance
2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Dispense cash, update balance
3 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Retain card, fraud alert, abort transaction
4 Yes No — — — — “Exceeds daily limit”
5 Yes Yes No — — — “Insufficient funds” + show balance
6 Yes Yes Yes No — — “Temporarily unavailable – try later”
7 No — — — — — Prompt PIN/card retry

Example 3: CorpLearn – Use Case: Take Final Assessment

Condensed Decision Table (key logic):

Rule Modules Completed? Time Remaining? Compliance Ack Done? Data Privacy Q Correct? Score ≥ 80%? Retakes Left? Final Outcome
1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes — Passed → Certificate issued
2 Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Failed → Retake offered
3 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Failed → Course incomplete
4 Yes Yes Yes No — — Auto-failed (privacy violation)
5 Yes No — — — — Auto-submit → Score calculated
6 No — — — — — Cannot start assessment

Quick Guidelines for Effective Scenario Breakdown & Decision Tables

  • Start with key decision points from Activity Diagram nodes or conditional steps in the flow.
  • List independent conditions (avoid redundancy).
  • Use limited-entry (Y/N/—) or extended-entry (ranges, specific values) formats depending on complexity.
  • Aim for exhaustiveness — every combination that can realistically occur should have a defined action.
  • Merge impossible or equivalent rules to keep tables readable.
  • Annotate business impact or test priority in extra columns.

By completing this scenario breakdown and decision table exercise, you transform potentially ambiguous narrative text into a rigorous, auditable, and highly actionable specification of system logic. These tables serve as direct input for automated test case generation (Module 7) and provide one of the strongest forms of evidence that the designed behavior is complete and correct under all foreseeable circumstances.